"Who did she kiss?" "Who likes who?" "Who did he ask for date?" " Did she sleep with him in her own home in the absence of her parents?"
The relationship gossip pervades the college drama scene. Because I'm abnormal and a sociology geek, I'm more interested in analyzing the gossip than paying attention to the content. To me, the way humans interact with each other based on their age, social affiliation, gender, etc. is fascinating. The relationship situation is the quandary that I find most perplexing, and it all boils down to attraction.
It's an extremely complex subject. "Why are we attracted to the people we are attracted to?" is a question that has no poetic answer. There are plenty of cliches that attempt to solve the problem, but they all leave gaping holes and could be easily refuted by the average middle schooler.
"Opposites attract" is a perfect example. Sure, men and women are opposites and are generally attracted to each other, but what about the principle of similarity and the generally undisputed matching hypothesis? It's been proven that we're most likely to select a partner who has similar values, ideals, interests, etc., but you didn't need a scientist to tell you that. How many computer geeks do you see taking the preppy, self-proclaimed princess to prom? Obviously, "opposites attract" has its limits, and is far too general of a statement to accurately address the issue of what attracts us.
It is my opinion that there needs to be a combination of similarity and difference in order for a relationship to be stable. Too much of the same can lead to boredom and won't push you to your limits and teach you about yourself, but possessing similar interests and values will provide healthy conversation and reduce fights. It seems to me that the most advantageous ratio is 3:1 in favor of similarity.
Until now, everything has been fairly straightforward and the perplexities have remained dormant. Simply mentioning the term "bad boy" or "naughty girl," however, unleashes a storm of controversy and dilemma. We're all aware of our infatuation with the people we shouldn't even consider as a potential partner, but I've yet to find a solid explanation of why this happens. Logically, we shouldn't be attracted to these people. We even recognize this in most cases. From an objective standpoint, it's simple: don't get involved. But this is where emotion gets in the way and clouds our judgment. Why do our emotions contradict our brains in this instance, and which should we trust?
The most constant factor seems to be how hot the other person is. There aren't too many bad boys who are scrawny and wear thick glasses and sweaters their grandmother gave them . Beauty, our view conditioned by society, appeals to our sexual instinct. Because of the great power of instinct, this makes up for a lot of shortcomings in other areas, such as intelligence and kindness.
As a society, we idolize those who look good on the cover of Fashion magazine. Consequently, physically attractive people tend to climb the social ladder with ease, skipping rungs that delay the nerds for years. We send the message that you can do whatever you want if you're hot enough, and you can pick whoever you want to sleep with. The attractive individual gets cocky and starts testing the boundaries. Add a little oregano, and, presto, you've got yourself a bona fide bad boy. All the girls go wild for this guy, despite the fact that he's a jerk. Reversing the genders provides the same effect.
My own best friend is in love (as he claims to be,though it's Infatuation)with a girl who's apathy to his feelings and is in complete contrast to his nature.He fell for her simply because she has the charms,the beauty and the aura that has made many go weak in knees including him though she has oodles of attitude that would put even Cleopatra to shame.Yet despite all the difference he still is hung over her and is obstinate enough to get over her despite knowing that she could never be his because he doesn't have those hot Greek God looks. Though he is down to earth at heart and I'm damn sure that he would be the one who would be the most faithful and honest she could have in her whole lifetime yet .....Nothing can change the reality ....LOOKS DO MATTER .He dreams of them relishing Gol Gappes at Lajpat Nagar and strolling around in streets of Shimla(So Cheezy and corny).I just hope that he gets over because I just don't want to see him heart broken when he in future sees her with other man .
" Handsome is one who handsome does" saying is obliterated in this era and is considered ostrich.
It seems to me that relationships would be a lot more successful if we took most of the emphasis off of looks and placed it on personality traits. After all, beauty fades in the end, while other traits remain. If only there was some way to channel our emotion infatuation and direct it towards the individual that logic tells us to pick.
Just my thoughts on the subject. I'm still kind of developing my stance, so I might add something later. Any ideas?